Deconstructing involuntary financial exclusion for African SMEs
Background
Small to medium enterprises (SMEs) in Africa are often at the mercy of stringent bank credit assessment criteria. Empirical observations on 13,783 SMEs in 41 African countries reveal the scale of the problem of involuntary financial exclusion happening across the continent (Simba et al., 2024). This research evidence illustrates how a conventional borrower/lender relationship model has limited application across many African countries and is continuously used in a way that involuntarily excludes SMEs from accessing crucial credit lines. A major problem is that this model has become universal and is rigidly utilized by bank managers to assess the creditworthiness of the owners of these SMEs. Its deployment in contexts where there are high information asymmetries and patchy credit records discounts SMEs from benefiting through this rigid one–size–fits–all assessment criteria. The strictness of the application process, which requires one to have collateral security, a strong bank credit history, and a guarantor with a healthy bank balance, is a bar too far for most of these SMEs in Africa. Consequently, they are discouraged from applying for bank credit. Yet in their resource-constrained business environment (Simba et al., 2021), any financial support provides them with a lifeline for their continued survival and growth in often chaotic market scenarios. The insensitivity to the context of Africa, its institutions, and the general landscape must drastically change, especially if financial institutions, among other institutions, are to meaningfully support small businesses known to sustain livelihoods, reduce poverty, and support gainful employment across many African economies (Simba & Tajeddin, 2023). Indeed, it is about time financial lending services consider incorporating other mechanisms, such as social bonds for assessing the creditworthiness of the owners of SMEs in Africa.
Making financing systems work for African SMEs
For a start, formal financial services must incorporate aspects of social engagements that define the landscape in which Africa’s economic transactions are performed, particularly when they assess the credit applications of African SMEs. Given the complex tapestry of economic and social interactions in an African business environment, it means that the continent's formal financial services industry must reconsider their rigid credit assessment instruments, as they evidently have limited application in such a business scenario. They must pay close attention to the localized African systems embedded in culture, social norms, and values. Recognizing and tapping into Africa’s traditional systems, including informal credit history derived from observations of how prospective borrowers relate to others in their community, can positively influence how bank managers assess the creditworthiness of the owners of SMEs in Africa.
Likewise, exploiting long–standing social order mechanisms that involve local elders, traditional/church leaders, and chiefs as entrusted custodians should be used as an avenue for acquiring knowledge about potential borrowers’ credit worthiness. Being a largely collective society, Africa has systems in which trust naturally develops through chains of pro-social acts, kinship, camaraderie, reciprocity, belonging and togetherness, making their connectivity ready-made fountains of knowledge to dip into when assessing the riskiness or worthiness of a borrower be it an individual or a business. Thus, discounting the value of such sources in assessing credit applications made by African SMEs is an opportunity formal financing institutions are missing to make their services more inclusive and sensitive to the African context.
An integrated model for assessing African SMEs’ credit application
Africa has powerful institutions that draw their strength from the community. Though informal, these institutions can be effectively blended into a taxonomy of formal credit application measures in such a way that alleviates issues of financial exclusion in Africa. Indeed, there is growing recognition in research that informal financing mechanisms, including community-based schemes (the so–called rotating saving groups), are powerful financial lending institutions transforming women's entrepreneurship (see Aliber, 2015; Ogundana et al., 2021; Simba et al., 2023). Similar to traditional formal financial services, community financing schemes have robust community–centered checks and balances designed to monitor borrowers and potential opportunistic behaviours. In societal systems built on collectivism, every member’s obligation to society is far–greater than engaging in opportunistic behaviour. That can alleviate bank fears of risky borrowers. Taken together, the cultural and social systems at the core of most African communities can be essential for unlocking crucial financial resources SMEs need not only for their survival, but for growing their ventures as well. Rather than perceiving financial systems that fall outside of the formal financial services as archaic and a remnant of past behaviour that will come to pass with modernization, there has to be some realization by banks that the African philosophy of business financing embedded in localized systems provide a cocktail with some of the answers that can go some way towards addressing issues of involuntary financial exclusion affecting large portions of African SMEs. To bring the African philosophy of business financing back onto the agenda, policy institutions that govern the financial services in Africa must establish policy reforms aimed at reconciling the formal financing and informal financing systems to build a continuum rather than seeing them as incompatible.
___________________________________
Aliber, M. (2015). The importance of informal finance in promoting decent work among informal operators: A comparative study of Uganda and India. International Labour Office, Social Finance Programme–Geneva: ILO (Social Finance Working Paper, 66).
Ogundana, O. M., Simba, A., Dana, L. P., & Liguori, E. (2021). Women entrepreneurship in developing economies: A gender-based growth model. Journal of Small Business Management, 59(sup1), S42-S72.
Simba, A., Ojong, N., & Kuk, G. (2021). Bricolage and MSEs in emerging economies. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 22(2), 112-123.
Simba, A., Tajeddin, M., Dana, L. P., & Ribeiro Soriano, D. E. (2024). Deconstructing involuntary financial exclusion: a focus on African SMEs. Small Business Economics, 62(1), 285–305.
Simba, A., & Tajeddin, M. (2023). Enabling economic and social change in sub–Saharan Africa: An informal economy perspective. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 28(03), 2350022.
Simba, A., Ogundana, O. M., Braune, E., & Dana, L. P. (2023). Community financing in entrepreneurship: A focus on women entrepreneurs in the developing world. Journal of Business Research, 163, 113962.
Your comment